News
Atrial Fibrillation Part I
Hector Fontanet, MD, FACC
August 5, 2005
Atrial fibrillation (a quivering of the upper chambers of the heart) is
the most common form of irregular heart rhythm. Over two million
Americans have it. It is present in 6% of our population over the age of
65 and 10% in the population over the age of 80. Studies done in other
developed nations have similar percentages (
www.affacts.org
). This
abnormal rhythm may cause no symptoms. Some patients can live with the
condition for years before symptoms become uncomfortable or they are
diagnosed on routine exam. For others, an awareness of rapid heart
beats, shortness of breath, palpitations, dizziness and fatigue can be
bothersome. Atrial fibrillation can be caused by acute isolated events
and underlying cardiac disease but may also occur in patients without
any structural heart disease.
For many patients, atrial fibrillation can be bothersome, but pose
minimal or no medical risk. However, for patients with coronary artery
disease, Diabetes Mellitus or high blood pressure, atrial fibrillation
can be dangerous. It can lead to tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy,
heart failure and stroke (the most serious clinical consequence of
atrial fibrillation). For this reason, proper diagnosis of atrial
fibrillation by detailed medical history and physical examination as
well as EKG and/or holter monitoring is necessary. If the condition is
confirmed, further diagnostic testing (echocardiogram, stress testing,
and in rare instances cardiac catheterization) will be performed to
determine if there is an underlying cardiac condition that is causing
atrial fibrillation and a plan course of treatment.
In some cases, emergency treatment for atrial fibrillation is necessary
to convert the heart back to a normal rhythm by the use of IV
medications or electric cardioversion. Long-term treatment options vary
depending upon the underlying cause of the abnormal heart rhythm.
Treatment includes restoring and maintaining normal heart rhythm or
controlling heart rate. In most cases, in addition to other treatment
options, patients will be treated with a blood thinner (Coumadin or Warfarin) to reduce the risk of stroke.
The AFFIRM Trial (Analysis of cause-specific mortality in the Atrial
Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management) compared the
two treatment strategies (rhythm and rate control) in patients who are
at high risk of stroke. Though the outcomes did not show that rhythm
control offered any advantage over rate control with respect to
survival, it did show that in each treatment arm the rates of stroke
were associated to the discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy or
subtherapeutic levels of anticoagulation (
www.NEJM.org ).
Your heart specialist will be best suited to establish the etiology of
the rhythm disturbance and discuss treatment strategies with you. In
nearly all patients prevention of stroke with anticoagulation will be
necessary. However, controlling the heart rate or restoring heart rhythm
to normal is a choice that requires careful consideration of the risks
and benefits to each individual patient. On our next article, we will
discuss specific treatment options to restore normal rhythm.
Sources:
New England Journal of Medicine
American Heart Association
Heart Rhythm Society
Atrial Fibrillation Foundation
back
Atrial
Fibrillation Part II
Hector Fontanet, M.D., FACC
Marie Cheine, Medical Writer
August 26, 2005
In our last article, we discussed atrial fibrillation, the most common
form of irregular heart rhythm. The goals of treatment for atrial
fibrillation are prevention of stroke, control of heart rate and
restoration of normal rhythm. As previously reported, the prevention of
stroke in nearly all patients with atrial fibrillation will be
necessary. This is carried out by the anticoagulation (blood thinning)
with Coumadin® or Warfarin. It has been shown in clinical trials that
treatment with aspirin is not sufficient to prevent stroke in this class
of patients. Common medications for rate control include calcium channel
blockers, beta-blockers and digoxin. Although this group of medications
is effective in controlling the heart rate they are not usually
effective in restoring normal heart rhythm. Medications that convert and
maintain normal rhythm are called antiarrhythmics. Long term options for
treatment are dependent upon the underlying cause (etiology) of each
individual case.
Based on the results recently learned from various clinical trials, most
asymptomatic patients will be best managed with rate control and
anticoagulation only, avoiding potential side effects of antiarrhythmics.
However, some patients remain symptomatic after rate is controlled. For
these patients, or patients who have underlying heart disease, the use
of antiarrhythmics has advantages, most importantly the improvement of
quality of life, improving heart function in patients with heart failure
and potentially allowing the discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy.
Antiarrhythmics, nevertheless, are a complex class of medications and
carry risk and potential side effects. The most effective medication in
this class is Amiodarone, which works by slowing nerve impulses in the
heart and acting directly on the heart cells to synchronize the
electrical impulses. These medications should be used judiciously and
patients must be closely monitored while using them. In some cases,
these medications can cause life threatening rhythm disturbances in
patients with certain heart conditions. For this reason, your doctor may
elect to start this type of medication in the hospital under careful
observation.
In cases where symptoms or side effects remain intolerable or a patient
fails medical therapy, other therapies such as electrical cardioversion
(electric shock to restore normal rhythm) or radiofrequency ablation can
be considered. Radiofrequency ablation is an invasive procedure
performed in the hospital in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
During this procedure, x-rays are utilized to position a special
catheter at the exact place in the heart where the abnormal rhythm is
generated and “microwave-like” energy is transmitted to destroy this
area and prevent the abnormal rhythm. Radiofrequency ablation is only
performed by electrophysiologists who have special training in this
procedure. Your physician can refer you to an electrophysiologist with
this expertise if necessary.
In summary, atrial fibrillation is a common non life threatening rhythm
disturbance of the heart. The approach for treatment varies with each
patient. Whether it is rate control or restoration of normal rhythm,
with any one of many modalities, the risks and benefits of medical
and/or invasive treatment must be weighed carefully and discussed in
detail with your physician.
Sources:
American Heart Association
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
Electrophysiology Division University of California San Francisco
Heart Rhythm Society
Medline Plus back |